That there is provenance information associated with the data, covering at least two primary types of provenance information
- Who/what/When produced the data (i.e. for citation)
- Why/How was the data produced (i.e. to understand context and relevance of the data)
Reusability is not only a technical issue; data can be discovered, retrieved, and even be machine-readable, but still not be reusable in any rational way. Reusability goes beyond “can I reuse this data?” to other important questions such as “may I reuse this data?”, “should I reuse this data”, and “who should I credit if I decide to use it?”
Several IRIs - at least one of these points to one of the vocabularies used to describe citational provenance (e.g. dublin core). At least one points to one of the vocabularies (likely domain-specific) that is used to describe contextual provenance (e.g. EDAM)
IRI 1 should resolve to a recognized citation provenance standard such as Dublin Core.
IRI 2 should resolve to some vocabulary that itself passes basic tests of FAIRness